Showing posts with label Books and Such. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Books and Such. Show all posts

Thursday, June 23, 2011

Literary Agent Mary Keeley Presents: "Grammar Shrammar" (a peek inside the newest Chicago Manual of Style!)


 Good morning, Seekerville, and help me to welcome Mary Keeley, the newest addition to  Books & Such Literary. Mary joined Books & Such as an agent in 2010. She had been a non-fiction acquisitions editor for Tyndale House. Books & Such Literary  includes Janet Grant, owner/founder, Vice-President Wendy Lawton, and agents Rachel Kent (nee Zurakowski) and Mary Keeley. There's coffee in the back room and a full breakfast spread awaits you while you chat up grammar do's and don'ts (that was a DON'T) with Mary!

At the recent 2011 EPA Convention in Chicago, Ruth Goring, editor at the University of Chicago Press, led a workshop on changes in The Chicago Manual of Style: 16th Edition. Why is this topic so important that an entire workshop at the EPA Convention was dedicated to it? While just a few grammar, punctuation, and spelling errors in your proposal can render it dead in the water before an editor or agent ever reaches the manuscript, using the latest style guidelines can communicate your professionalism as a writer and commitment to your craft.

The guiding force in making changes was consistency. There are also additions since the last edition that revolve around electronic issues. With this in mind, I’m going to highlight some of the more notable changes in the 16th Edition in a simple list by their numerical address. Disclaimer: this is not a complete list; you’ll have to purchase the book or subscribe to the online version for that. But you can save the following quick list for easy reference.
CMS 16 Edition Changes

6.119      Commas following other punctuation marks are now allowed.

7.16, 17, or 18    Possessives. To maintain consistency, it was decided that possessives of all names, including names like Jesus and Moses, will end in ‘s (Jesus’s, Moses’s).

7.76     Website is now one word (website), and worldwide web is capitalized (Worldwide Web).

8.136   Rulings for styling websites. Roman for name of organization (www.booksandsuch.biz); italic for title of book (www.365mostimportantbiblepassagesforwomen.com).

8.159   Ordinals and compound numbers. When the first word needs to be capitalized (as in the beginning of a sentence), both words are capitalized (First Century, One-Fourth).

8.55     When referring to a specific mountain, river, street, etc., both/all words are capitalized (Chicago River, Illinois River, Blue Ridge Mountains).

8.153   Brand names don’t need to follow standard capitalization style (ebay, iPod).

 8.157   Principles of headline style capitalization. Lower-case prepositions regardless of length or importance (A River Runs through It).

Chapter 5: the grammar chapter:

5.9 (and 5.220)     Mass nouns followed by a prepositional phrase. The definite or indefinite article preceding a mass noun + prepositional phrase indicates if the mass noun or the number of the noun in the prepositional phrase controls the verb form. If a definite article (the) precedes, the mass noun controls, and usually a singular verb is used (the quantity of coins saved this year has increased.) If an indefinite article (a or an) precedes, then the number of the noun in the prepositional phrase controls (a small percentage of coins are added each month.)

14.7  Access dates. Access dates are now allowed if no publication date is available. 

5.220  There is a great list of word combinations to watch out for. Example: close proximity. This is noted as redundant.

2.133  Checklist for proofing electronic publications. Also includes how to communicate those proofing changes on an electronic file.

11.2  Extended introduction to unicoding (for international characters across electronic platforms.)

 15.2  Uniform treatment in author date references and notes and bibliography. CMS now recommends a uniform treatment for the main elements of citation. Use authors’ full names rather than initials. Headline style capitalization for titles or works are now identical in the author-date system.

Here are three references you might find helpful to have in your library:

  1. The Editorium (www.editorium.com). A company that sells macros.  You can purchase “File Cleaner,” which cleans up punctuation and simple grammar errors. Purchase a yearly subscription for $30.
  2. Guidelines for Fair Use. Go to www.press.uchicago.edu to download a PDF file.
  3. Go to www.press.uchicago.edu to get Manuscript Preparation Guidelines (also includes author permission guidelines).
 The CMS editors aren’t fundamentalists about following their style. Each publisher has its own adapted style, which the editors wouldn’t expect new authors to know. But that’s a reason to follow the CMS for proposals and manuscripts because it is a universal starting point.

 



                                                                      
           

Thursday, April 22, 2010

Janet Kobobel Grant of Books & Such Literary, Welcome to SEEKERVILLE!!!!


Good morning, Friends of Seekerville!

Yes. This is the morning you’ve all been waiting for, the morning when Janet Grant, the esteemed and always frank head of Books & Such Literary, the agency that took a chance on Seekers Camy Tang, Cheryl Wyatt and yes, (hard to believe, I know…) yours truly, graces us with her presence here on the mainland.

We’ve coptered Sandra and Pam in from the Island, and I think Pam’s grass skirt is sure to make an impression, don’t you? I know I’m impressed and wondering if they carry it at Strawbridge’s in something other than sage. Forest green has always been more flattering to me.

What’s that, Pam? Oh. That IS sage… as in, the plant. The herb. Hence the overwhelming but delightful aroma of Thanksgiving stuffing in April. Uh, huh…
Well, who knew??? And it looks great on you, dear, truly. Almost Prada-like, it’s that fashion-friendly. Bless your heart. ;)

But I digress.

I’ve put out a lovely brunch table filled with all kinds of things, among them some of Janet’s favorites and a few Seekerville dependables as well. And since I don’t get to California often, Janet, I must say this is quite the view you enjoy from here. A couple of weeks back Francine Rivers stopped by and shared jam and tea with us, a most delightful day it was. Simply splendid. We cozied around her kitchen nook and watched the bird feeder while we spoke of great things, including quince jam. Tell me, Janet, what exactly are we seeing from here? Because I know that’s not a bird…

Francine and I live in the same town, just in case you didn’t know; so if she didn’t gush enough about Sonoma (yes, as in Williams Sonoma), I’ll just turn on my own waterfall of praise. But first, thanks for inviting me for brunch. I’m sipping lavender tea (we grow lavender as a crop here), laced with a snippet of honey. Oh, yes, those are cranberry-orange scones made by a sweet coffee shop down the street called Muffin Street. I’ve begged the owner (even dropped to my knees once in hopes that would do the trick) for the recipe, but she’s not handing it over.

My dog (see photo of the darlin’ boy) is draped across my feet in hopes that some sweet morsels of scone will fall in his direction. Speaking of that photo, it shows a partial view of what you can see from my deck, where I’m seated now.

A small ravine with a pond is behind our property, and at night the frogs sing croaky lullabies to us. Grapevines wind around the fence by the pond, and the plants’ tender green leaves are unfurling from their winter sleep. Down the road a short distance are the real vineyards. Roses often are grown in the vineyards because they draw insects away from the grapevines. And mustard nestles underneath the vines, adding to spring’s bright colors. Wine country is beautiful every season, but spring is my favorite because of the confetti affect of so many plants in bloom.


Janet, I am a firm believer that frog sounds are the birdsong of the night. It’s “peeper” time here, when the tree frogs peep from the ponds and marshes, calling out for a little spring lovin’… And because we had an early warm spell (after a very long, cold winter!) the frogs and toads have joined in the dance and it’s absolutely noisy every evening. Crazy noisy. Usually peepers are about peeped out before the regular grass frogs, toads and bullfrogs take voice, but this year they’re harmonizing.

And it’s wonderful!

I'm totally loving these scones, Janet, and I’d have given just about anything to see you on your knees begging for that recipe, but for good baked goods I’ve been known to do the same. My respect for you has only deepened.

;)


1.Books & Such has grown in volume and stature since I first met you six years ago. Yes, that was me, cowering and hiding in the back row, slouched down, chin tucked, no eye contact, listening to you talk about the unlikelihood of publication. Was I scared??? You betcha. But I was also impressed by how self-composed you were, how confident.

You’ve talked before about opening lines and hooks, how a story should grab from the very first line and this is an industry-wide push, but was this always the case or do you attribute the heavy emphasis an attempt to meet the time constraints of read-on-the-fly consumers and heightened competition?

When I was an editor at Zondervan and then at Focus on the Family, a slush pile was always a part of my life. As a matter of fact, at Zondervan we hired interns to read through manuscripts, but one year our intern arrived a month later than we had planned. In that month, we actually filled a room with stacks of manuscripts for her to read.

Now, when I say “filled a room,” if you envisioned piles of paper on shelves and a desk, you have not used your imagination sufficiently. The stacks were on the floor and rose to six feet high. She could barely walk into the room, and the desk wasn’t even visible. She was a stalwart sort, and though taken aback by the immensity of the job, waded through every manuscript and wrote responses.


During the rest of the year, we editors were left with our individual slush piles. With such an onslaught of material, we could only devote a few minutes to every unsolicited manuscript or query. This scenario occurred in the 1980s. So it’s been a long time since editors could lavish time on submissions that unfolded slowly but in a lovely way.

And reading habits have changed. If you try to wade your way through a nineteenth-century novel, you’ll soon find yourself wondering when the author is going to pick up the pace. So many adjectives! So many adverbs! So little movement in the plot!
Now, I do have to say that, despite the pressure to move quickly through the slush pile, everyone in publishing can tell you a story about the gem hidden in the blizzard of paper. One of my personal stories is finding a teen novel called Summer Promise by Robin Jones Gunn among the piles of prose. I had been commissioned by my boss to find a teen novel because, at the time, only a few books each year were published for Christian teens.


I was amazed at how many writers wanted to write for teenage girls, but how few of them actually knew anything about young girls. Robin’s manuscript really “spoke” the language of a teen and reflected the ways teens thought.

I remember, when Focus on the Family decided to publish Summer Promise, I had a conversation with my boss about whether having the protagonist named Christy might cause some confusion over Catherine Marshall’s very famous Christy. I pointed out, “If Summer Promise stays in print for five years, we’ll all be happy.” Here we are, 25 years later, and that spunky Christy Miller of Summer Promise still speaks to teen girls in ways they relate to. And the books in the series have sold millions of copies. Just gets to show I don’t know what I’m talking about!


2.And for the agent-seeking visitors of Seekerville, is your agency acquiring at the moment and is there anything in particular you’re looking for? Anything you’ve seen too much of? I hear there’s a current rush on sci-fi Christian cozy mysteries with a romantic Amish twist. Is that accurate?

Every agent is on the lookout for a project that starts butterflies fluttering in his or her stomach. You know, that sense of excitement that you’ve just discovered something that’s so wonderful, has so much potential, that you can’t wait to tell the publishing world. It’s akin to the feeling you had when the really cute guy in geography asked you out for the first time. Really, we live for those moments. So we’re all open to a project we can’t just say no to.
(Wait. Time out. My dog has moved from off my feet to lying next to me and is vigorously chewing two bones at one time. What a glutton! Oh, I have two scones on my plate…)


We see lots of fantasy with ideas that often are more complex than the writer is able to do well. Surprisingly, we don’t see much in the way of Amish anything—with or without werewolves and other such inventions. I think writers joke more about Amish novels than actually write them. Editors continue to ask us what we have that’s Amish, and we just shrug our shoulders and say, “Nothing, really.”
Lest you all barrage me with your Amish offering, I have to hasten to say that I’d still hold out for the butterfly feelings, even with Amish. I’d look for someone who understood the Amish and could make a unique contribution to that body of work. Writing Amish because that’s what the market is crying for (right this red hot minute) is unlikely to result in my wanting to represent someone. I try to be conscious of what the project is offering that would benefit readers long-term. I’m not good at chasing after the market because I’ve been at this game long enough to know how fickle the market is.

As a matter of fact, I can recall several years ago that editors wouldn’t consider anything with the word “historical” attached to it. I’d say to an editor, “I have a Christy-award-winning historical novelist--” “Historicals don’t sell,” the editor would interrupt. I found that response appalling. Historicals are a mainstay of publishing.

But then imagine my surprise when editors—all in the same week—called me and said, “Do you have any historical novels? They’re hot right now, and I need to find some to publish.” Such a biz we’re a part of!

What are we looking for in our agency? All of us are avid readers, and we’re looking for books we’d buy at the local bookstore. We look for writers who have developed their voice, who have an instinct for what will connect with readers, and who are willing to do the hard work of publicizing their books—because publishers expect that of every author.

Right now I’m thinking about representing a nonfiction book by a Harvard-educated doctor who writes from her own experience of raising her severely autistic child; a Scottish historical; and a thriller. What do they all have in common? Great writing and significant ways the authors can promote the books once published. But I’d be tempted to rep any of the three based on great writing alone—back to those butterflies.



3.When you receive a query or proposal that’s made it through to your desk, what is it that grabs you? Emotion? Writing Strength? Particular story elements?

I always begin my journey through a proposal or query with the subject matter. Might there be a place in the market for a book on this subject? Then I consider the title. A good title can pique my interest; I have to choose to overlook a bad or bland title. In a query, I then look at the basics of the plotline in the brief description. Does anything in it pleasantly y surprise me or engage me? In a proposal, I’m on to reading the manuscript’s opening. A strong opening line or paragraph invites me to keep going. If nothing snags my attention in the first page, I’m thinking of moving onto the next project.

The sad part of this quick decision-making is that often new writers don’t start their novels in the best place. Sometimes the momentum doesn’t pick up until the middle of the manuscript. But I’ll never know that because I can’t devote that amount of time to get that far.


I think I’ll take a swig of tea to comfort myself about the possibly wonderful novels that are never discovered for that reason.

I’ll join you in the tea. It’s wonderful, by the way. And you said it’s lavender? How absolutely appropriate. The new book that Steeple Hill just contracted with Wendy and me is set in a rural area of southern New York that has a lavender festival every summer. It’s a quaint, vintage, quirky experience set in the middle of a sweet, historic village. Totally engaging on all fronts. The first time I laid eyes on the village, I knew I had to set novels there. And that bit of lavender tea with honey… very Austenesque.

4.Janet, a lot of agencies don’t handle children’s books or the juvenile market. Yours does. Can you tell us a little about Etta Wilson and the children’s markets she handles? And what spurred you to branch into that arena? And with the upsurge of interest in the YA market, do you see opportunities opening up there? Would it be smart for an author to do a Meg Cabot, and target more than one area if they can handle it?

I met Etta at a writers’ conference when we were on a panel together. I liked the way she thought about publishing and serving her clients. I sensed that we thought a lot alike about the importance of career-planning, maintaining the long view of developing a writer’s publishing path and not making choices based on how to make the most money the fastest, which often leads to making choices that don’t serve the author long-term.

Etta has been an agent for children’s projects in both the Christian and general market for many years, and she has a stellar reputation. So it occurred to me that she could add expertise to our agency and contribute much to our client list. She has proven to have a strong sense of what will work in the children’s market--in picture books, children’s Bibles and middle-grade projects. And she has a wonderful Southern wit that keeps me laughing.

YA is definitely a growth area, not only in the general market but also in the Christian market. I think the Christian market especially has room to grow. But I’d say you need to have what Robin Gunn did to enter the YA market—a sense of how to relate to teens so they feel you are one of them and not an adult trying to be one of them. Authenticity in writing is key.


5.When I first met you in ’04… (No, I know you don’t remember me. Julie Lessman was in the very same room. How on earth would you remember li’l ol’ ME????)
You gave a talk about agents, agencies, how Books & Such handles things, how you envision clients and their futures, and how you like to help guide your authors along a career path that’s right for them. Books & Such has grown a great deal since then. As the agency founder and head, do you still feel the same way and is it more difficult to maintain that goal with your increased size?

That personal involvement with our clients remains a hallmark. I could never maintain that level of attention by myself, but we have such a great team at Books & Such who all value caring for clients as much as I do. Wendy Lawton, Etta, and Rachel Zurakowski complement each other and bring creative ideas as to how we can serve our clients better.



As some of you know, we try to bring our clients together whenever we’re at an event. So at writers conferences, if we’re on the faculty, we have a party or dinner (at Mount Hermon Writers Conference this year we sponsored an ice cream social at the Snack Shop). We often have gift baskets awaiting our clients when they check into the hotel where the conference is taking place.

And we have a retreat for our clients every other year. In 2008 we hosted the retreat in wine country; in 2010 we’re gathering in Monterey. We have workshops in the morning, many of which are presented by editors we’ve asked to join us. This year the list includes Lonnie Hull Dupont from Revell; Kyle Duncan from Bethany House; Cindy Lambert from Zondervan, and Dave Lambert, who is free-lance editing fiction. In the afternoons, we’ll explore Monterey and visit Steinbeck locales—and talk about writing just because we love it. I don’t know of any other agency that offers this kind of attention to its clients.

As a result of our 2008 retreat, several authors connected with editors who went on to publish them, lots of impromptu brainstorming of projects and titles took place; and the blog Novel Matters was born as we brought our upmarket clients together and introduced them to each other. The synergy was wonderful.


6.Janet, one of our questions concerns trends. I’m sure everyone is hoping you’ll pinpoint the next big thing, and if you plan to do that, feel free to call me first because I’d love to be ahead of the curve on that bandwagon, Sister! But as an avid player in the market, do you have any advice about current trends? And do you sense an upswing in the humor market or find people are reaching for lighter reading as world affairs grow darker?

I thought humor would find its way from chick lit to romantic comedy; that seemed like a logical move to me, but so far it hasn’t happened. I’m back to proclaiming I don’t know anything! But in light of our darkening world, I do see a few trends.

First, romance continues to be a strong force in what women are reading. A novel doesn’t have to be a formula romance, but readers want to slip into a fairy tale in which true love is found and a woman feels understood and cared for in profound ways.
Second, women in their 40s and 50s seem to want to read Mitford-esque stories. Take us away, Calgon. Escapist reading (and hence the emphasis on romance) is high on their list. Obviously, Mitford has had its day, but readers still want to pick up a book that removes them from the grit and grime of their overly-scheduled, frenetic lives. I think that’s a major factor in the interest in Amish books—they take us to a quieter place.

Third, younger readers are facing grim prospects for their futures, and that’s reflected in what they’re reading. They tend to like dystopian depictions of life. “Dystopic” is the opposite of Utopic. Rather than an idealized, harmonious world, dystopian novels reflect a world fallen apart. It’s “The Terminator” or “Mad Max” all over again. These readers want heroes who show them how to respond to a world of disappointed hopes, disintegrating possibilities, and powerful forces that can’t be controlled.


7.Pet peeves. Do you have any? If so…. Feel free to share them here so our prospects can avoid them at all costs! What bugs Janet Grant the most?

Hmm, I’m sure everyone in the office can tell you what makes me sigh with exasperation; unfortunately, they’ve all gone home, so I’m left to consider this by myself. Receiving phone calls from potential clients is pretty upsetting. Every day is so full of to-do lists that spontaneous phone calls are unrealistic to fit in. Plus they’re generally more helpful to the prospect than to me. If I want to have a conversation, I can pick up the phone and call.

Also, writers who don’t listen to advice. Oh, yeah, now I’m warming up to how upsetting this is. I often give writers feedback based on how publishers are likely to respond to a project. It doesn’t matter if I love the idea; if it has some flaw or goes in a direction that publishers avoid, I can’t represent that work as it is. So either the writer is willing to make adjustments or should look elsewhere for an agent. But to argue with me is futile. I can’t change the market. Really, I can’t. Neither can you. Adjust! Or you’re unlikely to see your name in print.

Oh, Janet, that is wise advise. Adaptability coupled with the ability to take direction and not dig our heels in… That’s HUGE. Sometimes that over-inflated sense of self we authors have or develop trips us up. Thank you for that good reminder. Adjust. Adapt. Take directions. Kind of like kindergarten all over again… so why does it take us so long to get it, I wonder?

8. And now a money question, Janet. Are you up for a money question? Because money/royalties/books/authors/agents/rights…. Oh my stars, there’s a lot of stuff to know and a responsible author ought to be at least somewhat in the know, right? And since money matters differ from publisher to publisher, it’s really important to have a great agent steer and guide today’s author. Not to mention keeping them from opening their mouths at inopportune times. (The gag rule: Least said, soonest mended. This is a rule I firmly believe in, having broken it in a past life.)

One of our visitors is wondering about agents’ policies and contracts. Does Books and Such receive the funds/payments/advances/royalties from the publisher, take their 15% and then send the balance on to the author? And if so, why do they do this when the agent works for the author? Shouldn’t the author get the money and then pay the agent? Is this a normal practice?

It’s because the agent is working for the author that the money comes to our agency. We check to make sure the amount is correct, and we prompt the publisher to make payments that are due. If we received the money from the author, we couldn’t monitor when it came and if it was the correct amount. Remember, it’s our job to do the business side of publishing. That includes money. And, if you think publishers don’t make mistakes, why you haven’t seen some of the checks I have. If you think publishers pay on time…uh, not always. Or that they always remember to pay…uh, sometimes not.

I will say that many agencies in the Christian market are set up different from Books & Such. When I created the agency, I modeled it after the way most general market agencies work. We receive 100% of money owed to our clients from publishers. Other Christian market agencies have 85% of the money sent to the author; the agency receives its 15%. Why the difference?

An agency that receives 100% of the money can more closely monitor whether the author did, indeed, receive payment and that the payment was correct. If the agency receives only its share, it never knows for sure what the client received. (The publisher sends royalty statements that reflect only the agency’s 15% rather than the full amount of what was earned.) That agency is offering fewer services than one that handles all the money. Trust me, much more work is involved for the agency that receives the 100% (including sending out 1099s).


9.Janet, as the owner/founder of Books & Such, the buck stops on your desk. How do you manage to juggle the business end of running a business and the chronic back and forth of being a very active agent? Do you sleep?

I’m the sort of person who would have her fingers in more pies—if she could find more fingers! Managing a business or an imprint has always been a part of my adult life. I try to take time to dream about what other ways our agency can meet our clients’ needs, and how we can stay relevant in the jet-propelled changes going on in publishing. Yet I’ve always needed that personal level of involvement with authors. I started out as an editor, and I love to dip my fingers into the pies of titling, plotting a novel, dreaming up new story ideas. To me, running Books & Such and being an agent is the perfect recipe for happiness. And I do sleep, but I often dream about my clients and wake up with new thoughts for how to move them to the next level. Just ask my husband: I eat and sleep publishing. (Although I like eating scones more.)

Janet, thank you so much for being with us today! Oh my stars, all of Seekerville is delighted to have you here, popping in and out, sharing your time and wisdom. Refill your tea, I’ll keep the pot of water simmering and our teapot cozied. Feel free to catch up on agency business while we chat, and we’re having the Life Ladies of the Wambach Baptist Church cater lunch today, and no one does cookin’ like these Midwestern ladies. Wonderful fare!


Guys and gals, please stop in, sip some tea or grab some coffee from the ever-present Seekerville coffee bar at the back. Feel free to ask questions and pick Janet's brain about all those puzzling things in the publishing biz. We've got a lovely bit o' chocolate to send out to some lucky visitor today. Be sure to leave your e-mail addy (disguised, of course!!!) and I'll tuck you in the drawing for a little bit of chocolate decadence!

Tuesday, March 3, 2009

Wendy Lawton, Welcome to Seekerville!


Wendy Lawton, awesome agent, bountiful artist, and all-around good person, good morning and thanks for dropping by Seekerville! We’ve dusted, polished, primped and primed, and I think we’re ready for a day of questions, answers and general mayhem.

[Wendy blushes and coughs.]

Wendy, you came to being an agent in a more roundabout way than most, and I find that refreshing.

Your story inspires anyone changing careers mid-stream, which is the case for many writers. First you enjoyed a successful doll making career where you ran your own thriving business The Lawton Doll Company. That led to authoring accompanying books before jumping to the other side of publishing as an agent. I love that panache and your porcelain artistry is beautiful.


What inspired the change and how do you feed those artistic juices now?

2009 marks thirty years since I professionally sold my first doll. In 2006 I was awarded Dolls magazine’s Lifetime Achievement Award. I was only the fourth person to receive it after Madame Alexander, The Steiff Teddy Company and R. John Wright. An artist is like an athlete, when the time comes to receive a lifetime achievement award, I’m thinking it’s a hint that it’s time to hang up the cleats. :-) When we closed our factory in October 2005, we were the last porcelain dollmaking company left in the United States. I now have my studio at home and still spend time sculpting and designing. Without any pressure, I’ve rediscovered the joy of finding a little child’s innocence peeking out of the clay.

My life work has been telling stories. I tell stories in porcelain and paint pictures with words—they are just different mediums. My first book was published in 2000 and there have been twelve others since then.

With dolls I’ve always enjoyed a loyal enthusiastic following.
I spent decades doing appearances, from individual toy stores to Walt Disney World. My work is in private collections and Paris museums. All heady stuff. But when I’d open my Bible, it talked about being a servant. That’s the one thing I’d never been.


Janet Kobobel Grant was my literary agent. Because of my long tenure as president of a successful business, Janet and I would talk business principles as they applied to both books and product design/manufacturing. I used to say they were parallel universes. I knew Janet was considering adding an agent to the agency. She had narrowed it down to one former editor.

As she tells it, she was chewing on her decision with Robin Jones Gunn one day and Robin said, “I can tell you are not comfortable with this decision.” In typical Robin-fashion, she added, “If you could choose anyone in the world to work with, who would it be?”

Janet says she didn’t hesitate. “Wendy Lawton, but she has a business. It’s out of the question.”


With Robin, nothing is ever out of the question. She urged Janet to call me. Who knew I was ready for a new adventure at that exact moment? I can remember being so excited that I took the phone into the garden and paced the whole time we talked. Isn’t it just like God? The moment I began to wonder what it would be like to be a servant, he gave me an opportunity to turn my back on center stage and learn.

As for feeding my artistic juices—I’ve always found as much artistry in business as in clay and pigment. I love helping to creatively shape projects and plan careers. We’ve developed many artistic ways of showcasing clients to prospective publishers. You should see some of the presentations—beautiful.

Plus, I still write and I still keep my fingers in clay for that sense of balance. I think it makes me a more creative agent.



I’m a big believer in God’s timing. That came with age and experience, and I think your story illustrates that concept beautifully.
Books and Such deals primarily with Christian publishing houses but is open to mainstream manuscripts. Any guidelines on that for people seeking representation? What works for you, and what doesn’t? How edgy is too edgy?


As to guidelines—those are on our website, but each agent has his/her own sensibilities. In nonfiction, I look for that book that stands out—a new idea told in the perfect format for that material, written by the go-to person for that very subject. Yes, that’s a big order, but since we’re talking what works, that’s it. Publishers do not seem to be interested in the all-around writer who can write on a number of subjects. They get excited by the specialist.

In fiction, it’s all about the story and the writer’s voice. Of course, I have to be drawn to the author, first and foremost, because an agent represents an author, not just one book. But the writing has to be exemplary. We keep talking about a tightening in the publishing industry. The upshot is that only the best new work will see publication. I’ve found it interesting that almost without exception, I’ve met my clients in person first—especially at writing conferences. Meeting face-to-face is an important part of the equation for me.

And you asked, how edgy is too edgy? I find that a lot of “pushing of the envelope” is a strange sort of pride. It’s easier to recognize than it is to explain. Too many writers are gratuitously edgy—as if to say, “I’m too big for these strictures.” [Picture me rolling my eyes.] Some stories call for teetering on the edge, but far fewer than the number we see.

I guess I could safely say that I don’t admire edginess for edginess’ sake, and it’s what we see all too often. I love a simple story like Sarah, Plain and Tall. Believe it or not, much of what passes for edginess has become almost cliché. You would not believe how many stories cross my desk with sexual abuse or incest as the conflict. It’s true that in real life those issues are rampant, but there are other inner conflicts that could be far more challenging to a writer. Both Janet and I have agreed we can hardly bear to read another “edgy” manuscript that includes sexual abuse, especially in childhood.

An interesting thing I’ve learned from my clients who came from the ABA—the strictures put on their manuscripts are every bit as confining as those in the CBA. As bestselling former ABA author Karen Young says, she grew tired of the push toward more graphic sexual content, even to the point where it overshadowed the story. But just let her try to develop a spiritual character arc, let alone mention Jesus. . .

An edgy book in the ABA would be a book like Peace Like a River, where a character works out his faith in Jesus in an open and honest way. In the CBA, we are free to develop the spiritual along with the emotional, the physical and the intellectual. And it’s true we have to be careful with profanity and graphic sexuality and violence, but it just makes us better writers.


Wendy, you’ve made great points there and your observations make a lot of sense. Developing a story line within given parameters is good professionalism.

We know that Camy Tang is your favorite author. (Giving a gracious nod to our youngest Seeker.) That goes without saying, at least when you’re in Seekerville. (Wink, wink) But what do you look for in an author? What do you look for in their work? What tweaks your interest and makes an author irresistible?

I look for an author who is writing out of his/her “literary ardor” (We need a new word to replace the over-used “passion.”) I love it when the writer’s life dovetails her storytelling. I look for someone who is hungry enough for this calling that she will weather inherent disappointments and delays. And of course, I look for the consummate craftsman.

It doesn’t hurt to have an infectious laugh like Camy Tang, either.


I know I’m looking forward to the fall release of Debbie Macomber’s One Simple Act. Congratulations on brokering that deal with Howard Books. It’s a natural coupling and should work well for all parties, especially the readership. Debbie is coming to the ACFW conference in Denver as Keynote Speaker at the time of the book’s launch. Kudos for timing! Did you really nudge Debbie into this endeavor? And how come you need shoes on a Florida beach? Inquiring minds want to know.

I think ACFWers will love Debbie. She’s walked that hard road to publication and never forgotten. Debbie and I have been friends for a number of years. She often talked about writing out of her own faith. I don’t think she needed much of a nudge.

And about the shoes—Debbie knows I tend to be a workaholic. I went down to her beach home in Florida to work with her. She thought it was too funny that I forget to bring anything appropriate for the beach—no sandals, no casual clothes, nothing. Leather shoes on the beach illustrate I’m a tad single-minded, I guess.


Whereas I would say ‘focused’, Wendy!

We wanted to talk about the ever-cheerful “Ten Near-Fatal Career Mistakes”. I’m awaiting your answers, as is the rest of Seekerville . What are they, and how do we fix ‘em if we’ve already been there, done that?

Hmmm. Near-fatal, eh? Let me count ‘em down.

10. The Everything-but Writer. You’d be surprised at many people hang around this writing community who know everything there is to know about writing, about marketing, about publishing, but never actually get themselves settled in their chair to write. They Facebook, they Twitter, they create queries and maybe even proposals, but they never manage to get down to the sometimes-drudgery of writing a whole book.
Antidote: Start eating the proverbial elephant, one bite at a time. Stop playing at being a writer and start producing.

9. The Assertive Writer. In this industry, it sometimes feels as if we need to rattle cages and demand some attention. Resist the urge. It’s dangerous to do anything that may earn you the label of “difficult.” It’s a small world and editors move around. Few things will damage your career quite so fast.
Antidote: Let your agent do the heavy lifting so you can remain unscathed.

8. The Know-It-All Writer. Nothing is as unattractive as a writer who is always right. This usually crops up during the editing process and can earn you a reputation faster than you can say syntax error.
Antidote: Pray that you’ll always keep a learner’s attitude. Getting a book published is a team effort. Value your team.

7. The Judgmental Writer. How many times have you heard a new writer denigrating the work of someone who helped blaze the trail? All too often. Under the guise of literary criticism, we often rip our colleagues to shreds. Some of those writers we criticize have hundreds of thousands of readers. We are also demeaning those readers. What does that buy us? There is nothing inherently better in one type of storytelling over another. Literary is not “better” than commercial fiction.
Antidote: Learn from the successful writers instead of disparaging them.

6. The Lone Ranger Writer. Some of the more timid writers among us would love to hole up in their writing cocoons and simple shut out the world. Unfortunately, in this day, that’s not possible. Publishers expect us to connect, to network and to partner with them on promotion.
Antidote: Even before you are published begin to connect with potential readers and potential colleagues.

5. The Writer/Artiste. Suffering from the “vapours” and “waiting on the Muse” went out with the Victorian dime novels. Writing is a career—a business. Yes, it is also an art, but as someone who’s made a living as a successful artist, I can assure you that you have to harness your creativity with disciple in order to produce.
Antidote: Practice discipline—the spiritual disciplines and the discipline of regular work habits. Don’t let emotions derail your God-given creativity.

4. The Jack-of-All Trades Writer. Don’t be the writer who resists being “branded.” How many times have I heard, “I write it all—fiction, nonfiction, Children’s picture books and poetry.” I could write a whole book on this. Think of yourself as a river. Which do you think makes the biggest impact: a wide, meandering, shallow stream; or a deep, narrow, swift-moving river?
Antidote: Focus!

3. The Bottom-Line Writer.
If it’s all about the bottom line, you’re in the wrong business. I’m not saying that you can’t have a financially successful career as a writer but it’s much like choosing to be an actor. It’s tough in the early years to get steady employment and it’s always a buyers’ market. You’ve heard the advice, “Don’t quit your day job.” It’s true. It takes a number of years to work up to a good steady income. The pressure of trying to make an unrealistic income will compromise your art.
Antidote: Check your expectations against reality. And don’t quit your day job too soon.

2. The Head-in-the-Sand Writer.
Every career move has potential pitfalls. Each contract has the potential for failure built in. A writer needs to be aware that if his sales numbers are low, he’s going to have a harder time making each subsequent sale.
Antidote: Your agent will weigh the pros and cons of every career decision carefully, trying to insure success on a project-by-project basis. Be aware.

1. The Impatient Writer. This industry moves at a snail’s pace and it seems to get slower every year. There’s very little that can be done to speed it up—everyone is overworked and understaffed. If a writer tries to push, he’ll very likely push himself off the desk and into the round file.
Antidote: Wait on the Lord. Practice patience. There’s no way to speed things up so there’s no sense of beating one’s head against the wall needlessly.


Wendy, I love those! They’re pointed and guilt stiffened my spine too often. Good points for all of us, both on and off “Unpubbed Island”. So tell me: what are you looking for now?

The easiest way to tell you what I want is to give you a look at what I’m proudest of.

When it comes to fiction, I love all kinds. I’ve been on an up-market fiction kick. I’ve got Sharon Souza, Bonnie Grove, Debbie Thomas, Caroline Coleman and Jennifer Vallent among others. Gorgeous writers, book-club friendly.

I’ve got a wonderful group of born storytellers as well. They write books where you hope the story will never end—writers like Kathleen Y’Barbo, Bonnie Leon, Lori Copeland, Ginny Smith, Ann Gabhart, Louise Gouge, Cynthia Ruchti and others.

I’ve got writers who are carving new niches in this market-- writers like Marilynn Griffith, Camy Tang, Jill Eileen Smith and Karen Young.

In nonfiction, I run the gamut from devotional books written by editor/writer Nick Harrison, to Christian economics (Good Intentions) by Bob Smietana and Dr. Charles North. We’ve even been doing picture books with writer/ illustrator (and Bethany editor), Andy McGuire. Bright and funny women’s books like Susanna Aughtmon’s All I Need is Jesus and a Good Pair of Jeans appeal to me as well.

That’s just the tip of a very creative iceberg. I enjoy seeing the book I’ve never yet imagined. And I’d love to see artfully written gentle prairie romances. (Like Sarah, Plain and Tall.)

I’d like to see inspirational Gothic romantic suspense in the tradition of Victoria Holt. (I’m crazy about good historicals.)

In nonfiction, I prefer the popular to the academic, and I look for those books that are high concept. I pay a lot of attention to the book format.


What do you REALLY not want to see?


I can’t wrap my head around science fiction or most fantasy. I’m not looking for children’s, juvenile or YA. And I shy away from “edgy” books and horror. (Think Philippians 4:8.)

In nonfiction I don’t want to see Bible studies (it’s a different market), sermons, columns compiled into a book, compilations of any kind, reference books, academic books or devotions unless they stand out for some reason.


At a time when a lot of publishing has suffered cutbacks, some publishers are booming. Steeple Hill is increasing its popular Love Inspired line by fifty percent, to six titles/month. That’s huge. Do you have any feelings about market trends? Advice for our authors who want to edge those doors open?


The market is tightening. Houses are having trouble finding enough slots for their current writers so it will be harder to break in. This is a time to study the craft, polish skills and craft unforgettable stories.

Many of us think the tightening is a knee-jerk-type reaction to our scary fiscal climate. Book sales are not as dismal as the tightening would indicate. That means houses will come up short. They won’t have enough titles to satisfy a voracious reading appetite—especially romance readers.
I think Love Inspired is, well, inspired to be expanding their lines. History has shown that when we tighten our belts, we often reach for a book instead of a vacation.

I’m guessing that publishers are going to be scrambling for titles to fill catalogs in a few seasons. Be ready.


Wendy, you’ve been a fun and gracious visitor. Thanks so much for spending time with us. I know you’ll get lots of questions from our visitors, most of whom will strive to impress you with their wit, wisdom and grammatical expertise. While you deal with all THAT, I’ll set up our Starbucks coffee bar in honor of your visit. There’s a no-fat mocha, no whip, waiting for you, piping hot. Obviously you’re a true coffee drinker! I frothed the milk myself, so we’re all good. And while I know you’re a California girl and West Coast strawberries are to-die-for, they’re not ripe yet so…


The Florida Agricultural Commission sent us fresh berries from their southern fields. Help yourself to berries and cream, strawberry shortcake, strawberry glace pie (my contribution) and fresh berry fruit tarts. And feel free to use the Ghirardelli chocolate (a California company!!!) fountain for dipping.

Wendy has assured me that tea-drinkers will not be discriminated against. She actually represents a few tea drinkers, I’m told, and tries not to judge.

;)

Ruthy