Showing posts with label likable hero. Show all posts
Showing posts with label likable hero. Show all posts

Tuesday, August 18, 2015

The Irresistible Novel

with Guest Jeff Gerke




Hacking Your Reader’s Brain

Do you remember when you weren’t a novelist? Back when you had never heard of point of view or dialogue attributions or show vs. tell? Maybe back when you could enjoy a novel just because…well, maybe you didn’t even know why you enjoyed it. You just did.

Back then, what was it that made you love a novel? Was it seriously that it had strong verbs or very few –ly adverbs? Was it that the author didn’t bury her dialogue? Was it truly because the book had no prologue or that the writer found a number of alternatives to “said” and “asked”?

Don’t get me wrong, I’m all about strong fiction craftsmanship. I am a big believer in how the art and craft of the novelist can strengthen a novel, and I not only use them myself in my fiction, but I have made a living teaching great fiction craft.

But I have never read an Amazon review (by a non-novelist) that said, “I loved this novel because it had no gerunds!” Or “I would’ve given this novel 5 stars except the author used the word ‘that’ seven times in the opening chapter.” Or “What made me love this book was how the author refrained from referring to floating body parts, maintained a consistent POV throughout, and made effective use of beats to simulate the passage of time.”

Uh…not so much.

What do thrilled readers actually say? They say, “I couldn’t put it down!” and “I felt like I was in the middle of the story” and “I worried about the characters when I wasn’t reading” and “It swept me away” and “I stayed up all night reading it.”

Did you notice? Not a craft comment in the bunch.

The typical reader of fiction doesn’t know—or care—about to-be verbs, weasel words, or whether or not the author introduced the inciting event within the first two pages. The typical reader of fiction wants to be thrilled, carried away, and utterly engaged.

She wants to not be bored.

And if you can remember back to before you knew all those fancy fiction craft terms, you might recall that you wanted that too. Still want it.

It used to baffle me that so many of the novels that became blockbuster sellers were so terribly written. In craft terms, they were junk. I recall throwing a bestseller across the room because it was so hideously crafted. And yet novels with high fiction craftsmanship most often sell poorly. Most often, but not always.

Then it dawned on me: It’s not that novels with low craft are embraced by the typical reader and novels with high craft are disliked by the typical reader. It’s that a book’s success actually has nothing at all to do with its level of craftsmanship.

That’s a hard pill to swallow for a guy who gets paid to teach craft.

So if high or low fiction craftsmanship isn’t what makes or breaks a novel, what is?

To quote the movie I, Robot: “That, detective, is the right question.”

In The Irresistible Novel, my fifth craft book from Writer’s Digest, I tackle this very question. In Part 1, I look at over 100 fiction craft “rules” and discuss what they’re good for, how to use them, when to break them, and how to not be paralyzed when they directly contradict one another.



All of that is setup for Part 2, wherein I look at the only rule of fiction that merits paying attention to much at all. It’s so essential I promoted it from rule to commandment. Indeed, the Great Commandment of Fiction is this: You must keep your reader engaged from beginning to end.

Your reader, you recall, wants to not be bored. Said another way, she wants to be engaged from start to finish.

How do you do that?

Our answer comes from a surprising quarter: neuroscience.

As I researched The Irresistible Novel, I encountered the work of Dr. Paul J. Zak, Professor of Neurology at Loma Linda University Medical Center. Dr. Zak studies the brain chemistry of reader and viewer engagement.

In other words, he studies what makes people become engaged with stories.

It turns out that the brain is doing one thing (or, really, almost nothing) when it is not engaged with a story, and it does something very different when it is engaged. Neurotransmitters like dopamine and adrenaline and GABA are flowing through the brain of an engaged reader. These are the brain chemicals the reader is craving. It’s what we feel when we’re loving a novel and it’s what we don’t feel when we’re not.

The key brain chemical involved in reader engagement is oxytocin. It is the neurotransmitter responsible for empathy. When you’re watching a video of a baby’s first steps and the baby falls and cries, you might say, “Aw!” and make a sad face out of sympathy. That’s your brain on oxytocin.

Your reader wants to feel connected to your protagonist. More than that, in fact. Dr. Zak says, “Your job as the writer is to make the reader become the character in the book.”

You can do that intentionally. You can trigger oxytocin in your reader’s grey matter. Along with adrenaline, testosterone, glutamate, and the rest. All on demand. All in coordination with your story.

You, my friend, are going to hack your reader’s brain.



All of Part 2 of The Irresistible Novel explains how to do this in full, but I’ll give you one key right here.

You connect your reader to your hero by showing the hero being vulnerable. It’s no mistake that almost every Disney child hero is missing one or both parents. When you see a child without a daddy or a mommy, you lean forward in sympathy. You say, “Oh, come here, honey, I’ll take care of you.” You see the person in need, your brain releases oxytocin, and you connect.

Show how your hero is likable. Show how he’s admirable. Show him being generous and standing up to the bully and feeding the kitty. Show how he’s similar to the reader. Show him in hard situations nevertheless trying again and again. Show him being nice to an old lady. All of these endear your hero to the reader.



But your secret weapon is vulnerability. When the girl is standing there in her new dress with her new haircut and her mother’s pearls and she’s ready to give her first kiss, and the boy finally shows up and says, “Seriously, that’s what you’re wearing? Whatever. Get in the car,” you feel it.

You feel her humiliation and disappointment and anger. And you are instantly in with this girl. You will seriously go with her to the ends of the earth in this story. Why? Because she was vulnerable and you leapt into that space of hurt, and now the two of you are one. When she’s holding onto the top of the train for dear life, your palms will sweat.

That’s called transportation, and it is one of three core ways you must hack your reader’s brain and cause her to be engaged with your novel from beginning to end.

To learn the other two core ways, and to find an entire brain chemistry story map, pick up The Irresistible Novel from Writer’s Digest. (Click here to find on Amazon.)

******

Missy Tippens, here. Y'all chime in and let us know what you think! As a reader, what makes you really feel for the hero? What makes you go all in?

Today, I'm giving away a surprise package to one lucky commenter! To be entered in the drawing, tell me who's one of the most memorable characters you've read and why (and also  let me know you'd like to be entered).

******

Bio: When you’re truly ready to make your fiction publishable, it’s time to call Jeff Gerke. Jeff trains novelists how to better do what it is they’re trying to do. He trains through his books for Writers Digest: The Irresistible Novel, Plot Versus Character, The First 50 Pages, Write Your Novel in a Month, and The Art & Craft of Writing Christian Fiction. He trains through the many writers’ conferences he teaches at all over the country every year. He trained his authors when he ran Marcher Lord Press, the premier publisher of Christian speculative fiction, which he sold after an award-winning 5-year run. And he trains through the freelance editing he does for his clients at www.jeffgerke.com. Jeff is known for his canny book doctoring skills and his encouraging manner, which leaves writers feeling empowered and like they really can do this thing after all. He lives in Colorado Springs with his wife and three children.

Monday, February 16, 2015

PERFORMING CPR ON YOUR REJECTED MANUSCRIPT


None of us like rejection. Sadly most writers usually experience a lot of rejection before they're published. Even authors with books on the shelves are rejected. Rejection is part of the business so don't take it personally. You may need to repeat that a few thousand times before you believe it, but it's true.   

My Irish immigrant heroine/American aristocrat hero story didn't fit the publisher's guidelines was rejected. The editor also told me the hero and the plot had problems. As I thought about what she said, I agreed with her points, but I also knew even with revisions the book wasn't a good fit. I went on to write other books, yet I couldn't forget that tortured hero and desperate heroine I’d created and had left languishing for years. 


Perhaps you have a book worth saving under your cyber bed. Not all of them are. Perhaps too much is wrong. If there’s no conflict, no goals, then there’s no story really. Not that you couldn't create goals, just as you created characters, but without goals and the conflict they produce, the book has no spine and may take too much work to salvage.


Perhaps the manuscript has been rejected but with a vague "Not for us at this time" so.you don’t know what’s wrong with it. You could run the story past a critique partner or hire an editor. Or enter the manuscript in a contest. But remember contest judges usually see only the opening. We can learn to write terrific openings without knowing how to finish a complete, especially keep the pace and plot strong in the manuscript's middle.   

I’m not recommending you revise an old manuscript at the expense of writing new, but if you can identify the problems and have learned how to fix them and you can't get those story people out of your head, then go for it. 

But first a rejected manuscript needs new life. I decided to give it CPR. Dr. Dean version.

I first re-looked my editor’s issues with the book. And then noticed one of my own. I can now see the book had a lot of telling. But I've learned how to turn telling into showing. And have studied craft long enough to fix the other issues. Or so I hope!

Even if the door is closed to a traditional publisher, writers now have the option to publish the book independently, that open door on the right. 

                                           
                                 The C of CPR stands for CRITICISM

Criticism of the hero: .

1. The hero is unlikable and his characterization is inconsistent. 

Even as I wrote the opening, I knew the hero’s interaction with the heroine could upset readers. As the writer, I understood why he behaved as he did and personally loved their confrontation, but I had to remember that the reader was meeting him for the first time and what the reader thinks takes precedence, especially if that first reader is an editor. 

So before I even submitted the story I put the opening in his point of view instead of in her thoughts. So I could give tiny hints at the back story. Even trying to fix an unlikable hero is not an excuse to dump back story. 

Next I showed through action and his thoughts a loss that tortured him. A universal loss that readers would understand and would react to with empathy.

And finally I had him save a child’s life. Surely that was enough for an editor to like him. 

Nope. My hero wasn't consistent in how he viewed and treated the heroine. I would show his attraction, then he would revert to his rude behavior, then he'd be attracted again. This see-saw characterization will make anyone want to toss my book against the wall. Why didn't I see that? Who knows? 

              The P of CPR stands for Possible Patches  

I had to come up with something that would make HER see him in a more positive light. Then the reader will hopefully feel the same. I decided I could make the hero the heroine's champion and save the day.  

                       The R of CPR stands for Repair

I have him rescue her from some creep’s unwanted attentions. Then in the emotionally charged scene that follows I show their mutual attraction, which is evidence that she's seeing the hero differently, and have him kiss her. That kiss is a risk, but I think it works as long as I show that the dynamics between them have changed. He can no longer despise who she is and she can no longer see him as a threat. 

This attraction doesn't mean they aren't still in conflict. Without conflict I don't have a story. To keep the conflict strong, I must raise the stakes, not keep recycling old issues.    

Criticism of the plot:

2. The plot involving his business and inheritance are not evident in the book's middle. 

I had a huge black hole in the middle of my novel because I’d dropped these elements of the plot, which are important in the end of the book. Yet the way I'd written it, they seem to come out of the blue. I got caught up in showing the romance at the expense of the plot..I didn't know then that the romance is not the plot. It merely complicates the plot. 

An easy fix would be to have him go back to work, but he's driven to find a killer, not to run his company. So how to fix the problem? 

What romance writer could resist this stethoscope?

Possible patches:

Show him interacting with characters who have responsibilities in the company or interest in who inherits. These secondary characters can make demands, hint at trouble, force the hero to take action. I will need to make sure these encounters aren't merely conversations. They must require action, create conflict. 

Repairs:

I can have the hero stop by his office, hire a manager, handle complaints, but the best way to keep the story active is to show him getting sidetracked by more pressing issues or by having another attempt on his life. 

Novels have a plot thread, romance Thread and faith Thread. All these threads force the characters to grow and change. If we writers drop any one thread, the story won't hold together. 

While I’m doing CPR for the plot and characterization, I’m be looking for telling. I can show with metaphors, description, dialogue, actions, physical reactions and the five senses. 

Certain words should alert writers to telling.

Adverbs. Don’t tag dialogue with “she said angrily” when you can show her anger by having her plop her hands on her hips, poke someone with a finger or slam the door as she exited the room. When I was a teenager my mom and I had got along great. But, I do remember after a rare conflict going to my room and slamming the door. Immediately I heard, “Don’t you sass me!” My mom knew what that sound/action meant and so will your reader.   

Was. Its fast and easy to say: The room was cozy. But telling readers that won't make them feel that coziness. Instead give details that show the room. Describe the cushy furniture, the soft glow from lamps, the blazing fire in the hearth.

Looked. Sometimes we replace "was" with "looked" and think we're not telling, as in: She looked sick. Bring her alive with details. Show her flushed face, red nose and dull, watery eyes. Just don't overdo it and have readers taking Airborne. LOL  

Felt. She felt like her world had come to an end, isn't as bad as writing she felt hopeless. But its clichéd and not as good as using details of the setting to reveal her despondency—her mood impacts how she views everything—or by giving physical reactions that show like her trembling hands. Or showing with words, internal or in dialogue. "How will I go on?"

Use the "Find" feature in Word and look for showing words like was, felt, looked.

Not that writers should always show. Sometimes telling works, especially in high action. But vivid details engage readers. 

Do you have a manuscript worth saving? Characters who live in your heart and demand a second chance? if so, give them CPR. 

As a reader what bugs you most about a book? Have characters stuck with you? Why?  

I'm now wearing my chef hat. I have the fixings for omelets and waffles so grab a plate and let's chat. 

A comment is your ticket for a chance to win a ten dollar Amazon gift card.